So my final conclusion:
- you don't want to get help
- you don't listen to my questions
- you don't provide necessary data requested
Last chance for you, before I'll talk to Reichi tomorrow morning to close this thread.
What is your data?
So my final conclusion:
- you don't want to get help
- you don't listen to my questions
- you don't provide necessary data requested
Last chance for you, before I'll talk to Reichi tomorrow morning to close this thread.
What is your data?
The Silab Tuners are under the fasted ones in the Industry and you seriously ask DP to slow them DOWN ???
I added a case of s2x multistream tuner on the Dreambox 820 exactly like the one used on the tub. Very easy and accurate search makes it easy to get 1915 with no problems.
I don't see the problem in the hardware because it fits well with a full list of searches and was not the same in older versions so it is software related.
Thank you for following this thread and for following me My theme design is also not a complaint Fixing the problem because I am a user myself.
I already told you that this is NOT the case, I already did tests on weak satellite positions, too.
Your problem is NOT reproducable and the box doesn't know where you live
So your comparison Middle East vs. Asia vs. Europe doesn't count and makes no sense at all.
If you are not willing to provide real support data (e.g. Enigma2 and Kernel logfiles) which shows that really transponders are skipped, then I recommended Reichi to close this thread as we are not getting further to solve your "issue" anymore.
The problem has been serious since the speed of the search has increased. By increasing the speed of the search it ignores some transponders during the search and denies that you have no problem with the signal being very high quality and smooth and that is precisely because I I have a lot of boxes that I don't see any problems with, but the new Dreambox box and the recent update are faster when I search.
Thank you for following this up.
Mir auch, weil da sind zu viele Unwägbarkeiten die so kleine Differenzen leicht erklären kann, da reicht ein schafer Knick im Kabel, ein LNB der nicht gut drauf ist, etc... gerade wenn nur eine oder wenige Frequenzen betroffen ist ...
Unchanged and with the same settings it has Box 820 Search 1915 Services
All I have to say is why the search results on two boxes at the same time differ from the same brand for me, while the conditions are the same?
I changed 3 items, first downgraded the settings, then replaced the two files, feeling more searching for frequencies and the problem was almost solved. I'll send you a simple search result with your files.
This has nothing to do with the LNB vendor, even the expensive ones have this from time to time. But I didn' Tell you to Swap LNB, you should manually Scan with slightly Changed Frequency to verify If this is causing your Results.
Blind scan Off course is immune against that Problem ....
No, I just did a test to observe everything.
Frequency shifting did not work as a result
LNB Frequency Drift hast nothing to do with the tuner reception capability.
I switched to LNB. The result got worse. I use the Inerto model.
First You are Not fixing anything, and normally sich behaviour is caused by lnbs with a frequency Drift. Some Tuner Chips are simply better on These ... Compare the frequency in Satelliten XML with the one shown when tuned and try to Scan with an slightly Higher and lower frequency, If then always found the Box hast No Problem at all
All I did was get the same result again. It's not about tuner weakness in signal reception I feel like it's a bug related to search time
If you do a little bit of searching and spend more time locking, the problem will be resolved.
Ok, but I still can't reproduce your issue. 11dB is not really weak at all. I don't have much more on my small multifeed dish.
With the same settings and features I have no problem with the rest of the boxes. It's a difficult place to work, and we'll find and fix that problem together.
I asked for the SNR (signal noise ratio) of these transponders
Sorry late for example I found 12539 which is very hard to get or 60% of the signal and I have a good picture. Click on the example frequencies of your service image
what is the SNR of these transponders?
for example 11137 h 27500
11448 v 27500
And where exactly ist now the Bug?
I did a manual search on each of the transponders and found that some of them do not search for the first time. It must be done 2 or 3 times to perform the search while searching for transponders. In manual mode all the transfers were received without a taker but I tried some of them twice.
Other receivers Count also the Data Channels, dream only Radio and TV.
In both boxes we search with the same settings but give different results but dreamone of the transponders are lost manually on the tub but ignores some of the automatic searches. This problem was not so acute in recent updates seen on older images.
Ok I'll do some more tests, can you please attach your used satellites.xml
And one other question, do you have enabled or disabled the SCPC option in the tuner setup?
I sent you the second item you mentioned a good thing in this case I am also searching for and announcing the result I had previously tested in clear mode and now turn it off and on.
My last search in scpc off mode
First answer my question did you try a blindscan (not automatic scan) with the One on the same satellite? What are the results of it?
Sorry I don't unterstand.
You are trying to tell the blindscan result is the same as the automatic scan result?
And if you scan the missing transponders with manual scan it's working?!?
Yes, it is exactly as you say that the problem of not getting is the problem of searching for the whole.
This is my setting. I tested the items on and off again
Yes I did work well but the overall result is not much different than 50 more searches.
Have you ever tried blindscan? The signal strength is not relevant as it also is able to receive weakest signals. I receive signals from 80°E to 58°W so don't tell me how the tuners work.
So what is the reason for this search difference? Why can't I have a full search on my 13 east box while my other box is okay?
Trust me you will not get any response as long as I do not report a problem to one of the developers, especially Ghost...
And as I said before there is NO problem.
There is a 100% problem with this because you are closer to the center of the satellite and receive a noisy signal, you will certainly have no problems but it ignores many frequencies in automatic search, while having no problem with manual searches while still having box time. The other Dreambox 820 has no problem.
Two or three people in this forum respond only to ridicule. Managers are still on vacation?
You don't know the solution to this????