The fate of old devices

    Hello,

    I have a question and I think the answer is expected from members, but I hope to get an official final answer.

    While these devices are still sold in some countries ( DM520 / DM525 / DM900 ultraHD / DM920 ultraHD ) What the fate of these devices in the future?

    Will the new administration continue to support these devices, Or they will only support new devices ( ONE UltraHD / TWO UltraHD / Seven UltraHD ).

    These devices seem a bit old, but there are still teams that support these devices and they still work very well.

    Edited once, last by Max11 ().

    So there is no official answer to my questions?!!

    Most of these devices need at least one recent update to fix recent changes to the feeds.

    Since migrating from HTTP to HTTPS, most of these devices are currently unable to connect to the feeds

    For example, DM520 currently can't connect to the feed unless you manually download three add-ons so it can connect to the feed again.


    1- libcurl4_7.47.1-r0.5_mipsel.deb

    2- apt-transport-https_1.0.10.1-r0.5_mipsel.deb

    3- ca-certificates_20211016-r0.0_all.deb


    Why haven't we been notified of this since the feeds have been updated and brought back again?!!



    " Nicht mehr Liquidator; nunmehr bestellt als Geschäftsführer: Ziemann, Tim Otto Wilhelm, Dortmund, *??.??.???? einzelvertretungsberechtigt mit der Befugnis im Namen der Gesellschaft mit sich im eigenen Namen oder als Vertreter eines Dritten Rechtsgeschäfte abzuschließen. "

    They stole the heritage of Babylon...then the land of Palestine

    Max11

    Technical support service is not available now. please try again later. :grinning_squinting_face:

    Don't expect them to answer your questions, even if they continue to support all boxes, no one trusts them now, even if they produce Dreambox 8K.

    The feed connection issue is now resolved. If you now re-flash the original image on DM520, you will now get 38 updates without installing any of the add-ons I mentioned here. :smiling_face:

    Wer soll für das Ding denn die Zielgruppe sein mit 2GB RAM und altem AndroidTV ohne Lizenz zu dem Preis?


    Kapier ich nicht, nur weil Dreambox dran steht? Die Zeiten sind lange vorbei...

    Ich bin nicht faul sondern im Energiesparmodus!

    Quote from scratchy

    Wird sich zeigen. Der Versuch ist zumindest erst einmal nicht strafbar ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    If you're unhappy, don't use it. You can leave the forum. We don't need your silly explanations. Anyone who's unhappy can make us happy by saying goodbye. It's simple

    Quote from alpha

    ist closed source... daher zum basteln nicht geeignet.

    And you, who were so eager for Dreambox to fail and shut down, constantly providing your ridiculous comments. If I were the super admin, you'd be the first person kicked out of the forum

    Edited once, last by vyperX: Merged a post created by vyperX into this post. ().

    Warum sollte es wichtig sein dass es open source ist ?

    Quote from alpha

    ist closed source... daher zum basteln nicht geeignet.

    Hast aber früher viel hier viel im closed source Bereich gebastelt mit deinen "Tools", die ja teilweise nicht mal dein Code waren :face_with_tongue:
    Andere haben es längst bewiesen, dass man auch mit closed Source viel umgehen bzw. umprogrammieren konnte, wenn man eben kompetent genug ist :winking_face:

    Edited once, last by makaveli: Ein Beitrag von makaveli mit diesem Beitrag zusammengefügt. ().

    I would not prefer the new administration to release an open source version of DreamOS.

    It will be tampered with by some amateur developers and the image will become unusable.

    Look at the images of OpenATV, OpenPLI,... When installed on Dreambox devices, it is full of bugs, bugs that I have never seen before, they just fill the images with the latest updates without checking if it is compatible with the device they are intended for or not!

    And with all these updates and additions being added almost weekly, the images becomes slow and unstable!

    Even though DreamOS is closed source and lacks support and updates, it still has the speed, stability, and amazing picture quality that open source has not been able to achieve yet!

    Unfortunately, many people still fail to grasp the distinction between the OE environment and Enigma2. All other brands utilize Dreambox's 2011 software with minor modifications in OE, employing outdated drivers for various brands. In contrast, Dreambox is continually evolving Enigma2, while OE is operating within the Enigma2 framework. Dreambox's Enigma is incomparable to previous Enigma versions. Moreover, Dreambox's professional developers are vastly superior to the amateur OE2 developers

    vyperX : There's a lot of prejudice in your statement. just because other devs are not paid for working on e2 it does not mean that they are not professional devs.

    Gruss
    Dre


    Boxen (im Einsatz): DM920, DM900, DMOne
    Developer Project Merlin - we are OpenSource

    Quote from dre

    vyperX : There's a lot of prejudice in your statement. just because other devs are not paid for working on e2 it does not mean that they are not professional devs.

    What valuable contribution do you think a brand like VU+ has made to Enigma? Let's be real, they're just in it for the money. Take a look at their software updates for 2023. Open community teams like Open ATV are doing a far better job. I'm not talking about teams like Open ATV; I'm directly referring to money-grabbing brands like VU+